Manually reviewing contractor-submitted rates against the prevailing wage schedule is time-consuming and error-prone at scale. WageHound's upload tool automates the comparison — import any contractor's payroll data in CSV format and instantly see where rates fall short, match, or exceed the published prevailing wage.
On a large NYC construction project, you might have 20–40 active subcontractors. Each week, each sub submits certified payrolls covering dozens of workers across multiple classifications. A project manager reviewing each line item manually faces:
WageHound's upload tool replaces this manual process with a structured import and automated comparison against the prevailing wage schedule stored in the database.
The upload tool accepts a standard CSV format. Required columns:
Optional benefit columns (include any that your contractor has broken out):
After selecting your CSV file, WageHound parses the data client-side before any import. The preview step shows:
After import, WageHound generates a comparison table matching each uploaded rate to the current prevailing wage for the same trade and classification. The table shows:
| Column | What It Tells You |
|---|---|
| Contractor Rate | The base hourly rate the contractor submitted in the CSV |
| Union Rate | The current prevailing wage base rate for that trade/classification |
| Dollar Difference | Contractor rate minus union rate — negative means underpayment |
| % Difference | Underpayment or overpayment as a percentage of the prevailing rate |
| Benefits Submitted | Sum of all fringe benefit columns provided in the CSV |
| Benefits Required | Total required benefit contributions from the prevailing schedule |
| Package Comparison | Total package (base + benefits) side by side for both sources |
| Lower Source | Flags which source has the lower total package cost |
This is a potential prevailing wage violation. The contractor is paying less than the published rate for that classification. Required actions:
The contractor is paying the correct base wage but reporting low (or zero) fringe contributions. This pattern is common in non-union shops that pay the prevailing base rate as cash-in-lieu of benefits but fail to fully document it. Require the contractor to provide fund remittance receipts or evidence of cash supplement payments.
The contractor is paying above the prevailing rate. This is not a violation but may indicate a negotiated premium rate in a PLA, or that the contractor is using a Foreman rate where a Journeyman rate was expected. Verify the classification before marking it compliant.
The trade/classification combination in the CSV does not match any entry in the WageHound database. This could mean: (a) the classification is named differently in the schedule, (b) the trade is not yet in the WageHound database, or (c) the contractor is using a non-standard classification that requires manual review.
Each CSV upload is tied to a project. By uploading monthly or quarterly snapshots of contractor payroll data, you build a longitudinal compliance record that shows:
This audit trail is valuable if the project is ever subject to a Comptroller investigation — it demonstrates that the owner actively monitored contractor rates and took corrective action when gaps were identified.